Multilateral Ranking Negotiations
نویسنده
چکیده
In general, negotiations within a group of participants are processes, that starting with participants in some arbitrary (initial) states eventually will achieve an agreement with all participants being in the required negotiated states. Process of negotiation is performed according to a negotiation protocol. Here, an ordering of participants is taken as the negotiation goal; constructing a negotiation protocol for this purpose is referred to as the ranking problem. The formal method used for discussing the considered issue are local computations; in general, they consist in transforming states of the whole structure by way of transforming states of its substructures. The paper aims to discuss communication structures that admit negotiations limited to direct communications between participants of a single ’association’ at a time. Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of such a ranking protocol for considered structures are formulated and a universal protocol for ranking is given. The paper is a generalization of bilateral negotiations presented in [14], where negotiations are limited to associations containing at most two members; the multilateral protocol presented in this paper covers the case of bilateral negotiations.
منابع مشابه
Verifiable Offers and the Relationship between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations*
We use the experimental method to compare second-price auctions with verifiable multilateral negotiations in which the sole buyer can credibly reveal to sellers the best price offer he currently holds. Despite the two institutions seeming equivalence, we find that prices are lower in verifiable multilateral negotiations than in second-price auctions. The difference occurs because low-cost selle...
متن کاملAn Alternating-Offers Model of Multilateral Negotiations
I develop an infinite-horizon alternating-offers model of multilateral negotiations, a common means of exchange whose strategic complexity has hindered previous modeling efforts. Multilateral negotiations occur in numerous settings in which one party wishes to trade with one of several others, but for concreteness I consider a buyer facing multiple sellers offering potentially different amounts...
متن کاملA Comparison of Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations
We compare the well-known first-price auction with a common but previously unexamined exchange process that we term “multilateral negotiations.” In multilateral negotiations, a buyer solicits price offers for a homogeneous product from sellers with heterogeneous costs, and then plays the sellers off one another to obtain additional price concessions. Using experimental methods, we find that tra...
متن کاملThe Effect of Offer Verifiability on the Relationship Between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations
We use the experimental method to compare second-price auctions to “verifiable” multilateral negotiations in which the sole buyer can credibly reveal to sellers the best price offer it currently holds. We find that transaction prices are lower in verifiable multilateral negotiations than in second-price auctions, despite the two institutions’ seeming equivalence. The difference occurs because l...
متن کاملAnalyzing the dynamics in multilateral negotiations
The purpose of this article is to examine phase-differences in the patterns of actors involved in decision making. Two phases are distinguished, the negotiating phase, and the decision-making phase. During the first phase the agent’s primary goal is to influence the policy position of other agents, whereas during the second phase the agent’s goal is to find a solution (especially if there is a ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Fundam. Inform.
دوره 63 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004